“We are committed to transparency but the disclosure we’ve made reflects the need to maintain the integrity of the system. Labour has previously called for an ISC investigation into the appointment.ĭowning Street sought to defend withholding the security advice.Ī No 10 spokesman said: “It’s our responsibility to protect the integrity of the vetting process which is voluntarily entered into on a confidential basis. “So far as the ISC is concerned, at this stage our request for information should have remained a private – and classified – matter of oversight,” the statement added. The committee said it was too soon to determine whether the information received is “sufficient” having only received it on Wednesday, despite having set an April 28 deadline to align with one set by the Commons. However, the ISC released a statement to say it had made its request for more information “on a classified basis”. He has been vocal in his criticism of the Putin regime,” he added. Conservative peer Baroness Byford also argued it was crucial that this new body is in place in time before we exit the EU. ![]() No complaint has been made about his personal conduct. Crossbencher Lord Krebs pressed the government on timescales for the green watchdog: We do not want to say that the new body is six months or a year until it comes into place it has to be there on the day we leave. ![]() Mr Ellis said that in response to a separate request, the Government would be sending information relating to “any national security matters arising” to the ISC, which normally sits in private. A letter congratulating Lord Lebedev on his peerage (Christopher McKeon/PA)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |